Wednesday, October 11, 2006

Son of... STUCK IN STUPID


Or, Beneath the Valley of Stuck In Stupid, or Stuck In Stupid Eats Detroit....

Call this post what you want, I'm writing because of something Tu Uyen Tran had on his "City Beat" blog:

"Eliot said utilities are already regulated so that's not much of an argument. He suggested that sometimes businesses are so stupid they need the government to tell them what to do, the example being the management teams at Ford and GM who wouldn't be in the mess they're in now if they'd been forced to make more efficient automobiles."

When recounting councilman Eliot Glassheim's comments Monday night on the 20/20 initiative, he related this illustration, albeit not verbatim, of the councilman's philosophy of what government is good for. Or at, I guess. Mr Glassheim seems to be in favor of the initiative to mandate "renewable energy", and believes that same guiding principle would be applicable elsewhere in the business world. I'm not going to touch renewable energy here, however. My heartburn today is caused by his view of what ails the American auto industry. He believes that had the government intervened however many years ago, and FORCED the American automakers to build tiny fuel efficient cars, they would not find themselves in the dire straits they are in now.
I laugh.
In making so preposterous a proclamation, Mr. Glassheim is in effect saying we consumers who chose to buy and drive large SUVs and pick-ups are wrong to want or need more interior room, more safety, more visibility, more traction, more MORE. Or... maybe we're....stupid.
In Eliot's world, merely forcing the automakers to build cars no one at that time cared to buy would have saved them from- what? The crushing costs of unionized labor's wage and pension demands? Sky-high health care costs? Mandated employer contributions (taxes) ? Short-sighted policies that emphasize shareholder returns vs. long-term growth? What?
We can argue all day (and sometimes I do) about what is killing GM or Ford. But what surely DIDN'T was building what Americans wanted to buy. What good are a thousand acres of Chevy Cavaliers or Ford Aspires sitting unsold? Even when a smaller vehicle is sold, profit per unit is lower because of certain fixed costs per unit. A larger, more expensive vehicle is going to naturally have more profit per unit both in absolute terms and in percentages.
When I read of things like this being said, I cannot help but think that this betrays a certain...arrogance on the part of those who would dictate to others what vehicles we should choose. That this is the way a businessman/ councilman thinks is disturbing indeed.

By the way, I AM glad you're getting better, Eliot. We would miss you if you were gone, and we will always need a few liberals to kick around.......

9 Comments:

Blogger C. Y. said...

The left can always provide entertainment.

(I can imagine all of them posting here after this)

:-)

10/12/06, 10:21 AM  
Blogger Eric J. Burton said...

Elliot is a moron anyway. How dare we want a vehicle that is safe and is nice to go hunting in.

10/12/06, 10:28 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Often the support he uses for his stances results in a delicious irony. In arguing for government support of the arts, he referred to Queen Isabella's loan to Columbus. "Where would be now if not for that government support?" Apparently he buys into the myth that she hocked her jewels. Fact is, the money loaned was that confiscated from the Jews who were expelled in 1492. The only apt analogy is that the city council is also using conficated money.

10/15/06, 11:49 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Spoken like a true socialist. Oh, I'm sorry..."progressive".

10/15/06, 6:02 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I hope it's not too late to weigh in that the use of the word "stupid" was mine. I get flip that way. Eliot's very mild by comparison. Remember, if it's got quotes around it, it's verbatim. If it doesn't it's me. Back to your liberal-bashing. Sorry to interrupt.

10/16/06, 2:00 AM  
Blogger Good Ol' Boy said...

I had noted that, but glad you mentioned it again. And no, its never too late. Not like I have a ton of traffic here!

10/16/06, 8:34 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You really need to watch what Tu-Uyen writes on his blog and especially in the paper. He often makes opinions look like facts by failing to clearly attribute the source. Since he is a "reporter", people often think he is reporting facts, when he is simply stating someone elses beliefs.

The skeptic in me hasn't decided if that is just his style, or if he is trying to influence opinions.

10/16/06, 8:20 PM  
Blogger Good Ol' Boy said...

I think for the greater part he does a good job reporting. He certainly has the background to follow intelligently what he is reporting,unlike some others at the Herald. His blog is his own, though, and he should be free to express his opinions there, and I read it and take it as such. What do you say, Tu Uyen?

10/16/06, 9:33 PM  
Blogger C. Y. said...

2E may write a few things I don't agree with, but I honestly think he digs a lot more than others do. The paper probably doesn't give him the room he needs so he finishes it in his blog. (I'll bet the paper controls a little of what he wants to say as well.)

Even though I dont' agree with his leaning to the left, I appreciate is digging instead of just stirring.

2E's nemesis (his words, not mine)

:-)

:-)

10/18/06, 3:27 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home